Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Sherwin-Williams Company, Appellant, v. Thomas L. Feitner et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Sherwin-Williams Company, Appellant, v. Thomas L. Feitner et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents
167 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Sherwin-Williams Company, Appellant, v. Thomas L. Feitner et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.
(Submitted June 5, 1901;
decided June 21, 1901.)
People ex rel. Sherwin -Williams Oo. v. Feiiner, 60 App. Div. 628, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made April 4, 1901, affirming an order of Special Term quashing a writ of certiorari to review the action of the defendants in assessing the capital of the relator invested in its business in the city of New York.
Porter da Kihaert for appellant.
John Whalen, Corporation Cownsel {James M. Ward of counsel) for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs,' on authority of People ex rel. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Barker (157 N. Y. 159).
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Iandón, Cullen and Webneb, JJ.