Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Jersey v. New York et al., 1968 — 390 U.S. 1000 · caselaw · US
General
New Jersey v. New York et al.
390 U.S. 1000·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 34,
Orig.
New Jersey v. New York et al.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, on the motion. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, Ruth Kessler Toeh, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman for the State of New York, and David W. Peck and L. Robert Driver, Jr., for Hudson Rapid Tubes Corp., defendants, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file bill of complaint denied.