Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip W. Frederick, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 667 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip W. Frederick, Appellant
143 N.Y. 667·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip W. Frederick, Appellant.
(Argued October 10, 1894;
decided October 30, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made May 8, 1894, which affirmed a judgment of the Fulton County Court of Sessions affirming a judgment entered upon the decision of a justice of the peace convicting defendant of the crime of being a disorderly person, under section ■899 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in failing to support his wife.
Frank L. Anderson for appellant.
Horton D. Wright for respondent.
Reported below, 78 Hun, 36.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.