Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marie Huebner, as Administratrix of the Estate of Otto Huebner, Deceased, Appellant, v. George L. Hammond et al., Respondents, 1903 — 177 N.Y. 537 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Marie Huebner, as Administratrix of the Estate of Otto Huebner, Deceased, Appellant, v. George L. Hammond et al., Respondents
177 N.Y. 537·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marie Huebner, as Administratrix of the Estate of Otto Huebner, Deceased, Appellant, v. George L. Hammond et al., Respondents.
Huebner v. Hammond, 80 App. Div. 122, affirmed.
(Argued December 4, 1903;
decided December 18, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 13, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
Perry P. Trafford for appellant.
Frank O. Avery and Mark M. Sehlesinger for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there was no proof of negligence to submit to the jury.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.