General
JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
385 U.S. 37·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would set the case for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 486.
Decided November 7, 1966.
Leslie Hodson, Hammond E. Chaff etz, Joseph DuCoeur and Richard J. Archer for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Turner for the United States, and Burnham Enersen and Stephen Grant for General Brewing Corp., appellees.
Godfrey L. Munter, Jr., for Ray et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of Philip A. Ray et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would set the case for argument.