General

George P. Rowell et al., Appellants, v. Edward W. Lambert, Respondent; Same v. Henry Tuck, Respondent; Same v. Gustavus S. Winston, Respondent

151 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

George P. Rowell et al., Appellants, v. Edward W. Lambert, Respondent; Same v. Henry Tuck, Respondent; Same v. Gustavus S. Winston, Respondent. Mem. of decisions below, 79 Hun, 614. (Argued October 26, 1896; decided December 1, 1896.) Appeals from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 19, 1894, which affirmed judgments in .favor of the respective defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaints upon trial at Circuit. These cases were argued with and decided upon Rowell et al. v. Janvrin (ante, p. 60). Philip Carpenter and Edward Hassett for appellants. Dickinson W. Richards for respondents. [MAJORITY] Judgments dismissing the complaints, without requiring the defendants to give any proof, reversed, new trials granted, costs to abide event. All concur.