Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Trustees of Princeton University et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Guaranty Trust Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Glines et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Orton et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; and United States Trust Co., Trustee, v. Group of Institutional Investors et al., 1943 — 318 U.S. 775 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Trustees of Princeton University et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Guaranty Trust Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Glines et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Orton et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; and United States Trust Co., Trustee, v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.
318 U.S. 775·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 39.
Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Trustees of Princeton University et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Guaranty Trust Co. et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Glines et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; Orton et al. v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.; and United States Trust Co., Trustee, v. Group of Institutional Investors et al.
No. 47.
No. 51.
No. 52.
No. 53.
No. 54.
No. 55.
March 15, 1943.
Messrs. W. F. Peter, Reese D. Alsop, Ernest S. Ballard, William A. McSwain, Frederic Burnham, Frederick Secord, Charles Myers, and Edwin PL. Cassels for petitioners in No. 39; Mr. Frank C. Nicodemus, Jr. for petitioner in No. 47; Mr. Frederick J. Moses for petitioners in No. 51; Messrs. Edwin S. S. Sunderland, Thomas O’G. FitzGibbon, Henry F. Tenney, and William V. Hodges for petitioners in Nos. 52 and 53; Messrs. Edward R. Johnston and Albert K. Orschel for petitioners in No. 54; and Messrs. George L. Shearer and McCready Sykes for petitioner in No. 55. Messrs. Kenneth F. Bur^ gess, Douglas F. Smith, and Fred N. Oliver for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.