General
California Texas Oil Co., Ltd. et al. v. Kirkland, U. S. District Judge
344 U.S. 904·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 421.
California Texas Oil Co., Ltd. et al. v. Kirkland, U. S. District Judge.
Leo T. Kissam, Lloyd N. Cutler and Albert E. Van Dusen for the California Texas Oil Co., Ltd., George S. Leisure and Goldthwaite H. Dorr for the So-cony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc., John T. Cahill and John F. Sonnett for the Standard Oil Co. of California, Oscar John Dorwin, S. A. L. Morgan and John J. Wilson for the Texas Company, and George W. Ray, Jr., John Noble and Lowell Wadmond for the Arabian American Oil Co., petitioners.
Acting Solicitor General Stern, Acting Assistant Attorney General Clapp, Leonard J. Emmerglick and Ralph S. Spritzer for the United States in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.