Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al., 1953 — 345 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al.
345 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 591.
No. 592.
No. 593.
No. 594.
No. 595.
No. 596.
No. 658.
Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al.
Wyckoff Westover for Mallonee et al., and Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association, petitioners in No. 591; W. I. Gilbert, Jr. for the Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al., petitioners in No. 592, and for petitioner in No. 594; F. Henry NeCasek for petitioner in No. 593; Raymond Tremaine for Wallis, and Mr. NeCasek for Turner, petitioners in No. 595; Frederic A. Shaffer and Lyman B. Sutter for petitioner in No. 596; and Emmett E. Doherty for petitioner in No. 658. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Herman Marcuse for Fahey et al.; and Sylvester Hoff-mann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.