General
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Kate G. Wolfe, Administratrix, etc.
187 U.S. 638·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 128.
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Kate G. Wolfe, Administratrix, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska-
Argued December 17, 1902.
Decided December 22, 1902.
Mr. J. W. Deweese and Mr. Charles F. Manderson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. T. J. Mahoney for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment’ affirmed with costs, on the authority of Chicago, Rock Island &c. Railroad Company v. Zernecke, 183 U. S. 582.