Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wolfe v. Missouri et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
Wolfe v. Missouri et al.
368 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 494,
Misc.
Wolfe v. Missouri et al.
Bernard J. Mellman for petitioner. Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Ben Ely, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied without prejudice to the petitioner’s habeas corpus proceeding now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.