General
BADGER v. RANLETT
154 U.S. 677·Supreme Court of the United States·1882
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BADGER v. RANLETT.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 587.
Submitted November 27, 1882.
Decided December 11, 1882.
Badger v. Banlett, 106 U. S. 255, followed.
Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Phillips for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. W. Howe and Mr. J. H. Kennard for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Blatchford]
Mr. Justice Blatchford
delivered the opinion of the court.
The questions presented in this case are the same as those in the other suit between the same parties, decided herewith, and for the reasons assigned in the opinion in that ease the judgment" in this case is Affirmed.