Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fisher, Receiver, v. Whiton, Executrix, et al., 1942 — 317 U.S. 602 · caselaw · US
General
Fisher, Receiver, v. Whiton, Executrix, et al.
317 U.S. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 85.
Fisher, Receiver, v. Whiton, Executrix, et al.
December 14, 1942.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the opinion of the Court in No. 85, Fisher v. Whiton, filed December 7, 1942, be amended by inserting after the word “eliminated” in footnote 5 on page 2 of the slip opinion the following phrase: “where there has been compliance with the provisions of the statute,”. .
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 217.