Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Maine et al.; and United States v. Florida, 1975 — 420 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Maine et al.; and United States v. Florida
420 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.*
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 35,
Orig.
No. 52,
Orig.
United States v. Maine et al.; and United States v. Florida.
[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 904 and 419 U. S. 814.]
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the Solicitor General for reallocation and reduction of time for oral argument granted. It is ordered that a total of three hours be allotted for oral argument in No. 35, Orig., and that a total of one and one-half hours be allotted for oral argument in No. 52, Orig.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.*