General
George D. Mackay, Respondent, v. Frank Seaman, Appellant
191 N.Y. 537·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George D. Mackay, Respondent, v. Frank Seaman, Appellant.
Haclcay v. Seaman, 116 App. Div. 924, affirmed.
(Argued February 26, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 15, 1907, affirming a judgment in fav.or of plaintiff sntered upon a verdict and an order, denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained through the false representations of the defendant in a sale of stock to the plaintiff.
Waldo G. Morse for appellant.
James M. Gray for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs and ten per cent damages for delay under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.