General
Johanna Bergen, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant
125 N.Y. 762·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur, except Earl, Peckham and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johanna Bergen, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 29, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 8, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of- plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Julien T. Dmies for appellant.
Thomas F. Magner for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, Peckham and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.