Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William D. GORDON, Secretary of Banking of Pennsylvania, Statutory Receiver of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, Appellant, v. Joseph OMINSKY and Robert B. Ely, 3rd, Federal Receivers of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, et al., Appellees, 1934 — 72 F.2d 517 · caselaw · US
General
William D. GORDON, Secretary of Banking of Pennsylvania, Statutory Receiver of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, Appellant, v. Joseph OMINSKY and Robert B. Ely, 3rd, Federal Receivers of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, et al., Appellees
72 F.2d 517·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William D. GORDON, Secretary of Banking of Pennsylvania, Statutory Receiver of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, Appellant, v. Joseph OMINSKY and Robert B. Ely, 3rd, Federal Receivers of Christian A. Fisher Building and Loan Association, et al., Appellees.
No. 5267.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 25, 1934.
Wm. A. Sehnader, Atty. Gen., Harold D. Saylor, Dep. Atty. Gen., and Clarence J. Buckman, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Oscar Brown and Charles Polis, both of Philadelphia., Pa., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Writ of certiorari granted 55 S. Ct. 140, 79 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — DAVIS, Circuit Judge.]
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The facts in this case are substantially like those in the ease of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John G. Williams et al. (C. C. A.) 72 F.(2d) 509, in which an opinion has just been filed. The same issues are involved in this case as were in that. Consequently, on the authority of that case, the decree of the District Court is affirmed.