General
Moffett et al. v. Commerce Trust Co. et al.
329 U.S. 669·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 318.
Moffett et al. v. Commerce Trust Co. et al.
October 14, 1946.
Martin J. O’Donnell for appellants.
Charles M. Black-mar, John T. Harding, R. C. Tucker, Walter A. Raymond and B. C. Howard for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165; Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111.