General
Sarah J. Pirsson et al., Respondents, v. Oliver M. Arkenburgh, Appellant
126 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah J. Pirsson et al., Respondents, v. Oliver M. Arkenburgh, Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1891;
decided May 8, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made January 5, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Robert F. Bittle for appellant.
John Alex. Beall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.