General
Banning v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Co.; and Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Co. v. Banning
338 U.S. 815·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 68.
No. 93.
Banning v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Co.; and Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Co. v. Banning.
Lloyd T. Bailey for petitioner in No. 68 and respondent in No. 93. Clifford B. Longley for petitioner in No. 93 and respondent in No. 68.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.