Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LIST v. PENNSYLVANIA, 1888 — 131 U.S. 396 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
LIST v. PENNSYLVANIA
131 U.S. 396·Supreme Court of the United States·1888
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LIST v. PENNSYLVANIA.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 984.
Decided December 10, 1888.
The death of the accused in a criminal case brought here by writ of error abates the suit.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. W P. Potter for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. D. Porter for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per curiam]
Per curiam
: The’ death of George B. List, the plaintiff in error in this cause, having been suggested in a communication from counsel for defendant in error to the clerk, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby,
.Dismissed.