Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kenosha Motor Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al., 1949 — 338 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Kenosha Motor Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al.
338 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 242.
Kenosha Motor Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al.
Adolph J. Bieberstein and R. M. Rieser for appellant. Thomas E. Fairchild, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, and T. H. Spence for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.