Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles E. SAWYER, Trustee, v. ROCHESTER TRUST CO., 1932 — 57 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
General
Charles E. SAWYER, Trustee, v. ROCHESTER TRUST CO.
57 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. SAWYER, Trustee, v. ROCHESTER TRUST CO.
No. 2632.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1932.
See, also, 45 F.(2d) 867.
Harry Shapiro, of Boston, Mass. (Alexander G. Gould, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellant.
Conrad E. Snow, of Rochester, N. H., for appellee.
Before BINGHAM and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and HALE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court affirmed without opinion.