Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. ROCKFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, 1933 — 67 F.2d 213 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. ROCKFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent
67 F.2d 213·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. ROCKFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 5020.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 20, 1933.
Pat Malloy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and E. Barrett Prettyman, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and James C. Maddox, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
O. N. Welch, for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and FITZ HENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — EVANS, Circuit Judge.]
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The two issues presented for determination by this appeal are identical with two presented in appeals Nos. 4993 and 4999, involving the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the Lafayette Life Insurance Company. The issues are: (1) The constitutionality of section 203 (b) of the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 2203 (b)), requiring the reporting of rental value, calculated according to statute, of home office space occupied by taxpayer, if it seeks certain statutory deductions; (2) The deductibility of depreciation upon furniture and fixtures used in the underwriting department of the company.
The parties stipulated that the case be submitted on briefs and without oral argument. In view of the similarity of issues in this ease and in appeals Nos. 4993 and 4999, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lafayette Life Insurance Company (C. C. A.) 67 F. (2d) 2-09, decided this day, the decision in these latter cases shall govern the disposition of this appeal.
It is therefore ordered that the order of •the Board be, and it is hereby, reversed with directions to redetermine the tax of the respondent herein in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in Nos. 4993 and 4999.