Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Morningstar v. United States, 1972 — 409 U.S. 896 · caselaw · US
General
Morningstar v. United States
409 U.S. 896·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-6528.
Morningstar v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari, vacate judgment, and remand case for further proceedings in light of the memorandum of the Solicitor General, filed June 7, 1972, stating that the prejeopardy dismissal of the indictment was appeal-able, not to the Court of Appeals, but directly to this Court. See United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp., 402 U. S. 558 (1971), and United States v. Fabrizio, 385 U. S. 263 (1966).