Administrative
C & L TRANSPORT OF CITRUS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Richard J. OSTEEN, individually, and Betty Joe Osteen, Appellees
763 So. 2d 1217·Florida District Court of Appeal·2000·FL
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C & L TRANSPORT OF CITRUS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Richard J. OSTEEN, individually, and Betty Joe Osteen, Appellees.
No. 1D00-0323.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 26, 2000.
R. Frank Myers of Messer, Caparello and Self, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Benjamin D. Rust, Tallahassee, and Patrice A. Talisman of Hersch and Talisman, Miami, for Appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant’s response to the show cause order dated February 3, 2000, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because the Final Summary Judgment of which appellant seeks review merely grants a motion and does not actually determine liability, the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a) (3)(C) (iv). See Knight v. Nelson, 574 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). And the Order on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs is also not an appealable order. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
DISMISSED.
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.