Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John M. Crowell, Respondent, v. Mary Elizabeth Jackson et al., Appellants, 1877 — 70 N.Y. 603 · caselaw · US
Administrative
John M. Crowell, Respondent, v. Mary Elizabeth Jackson et al., Appellants
70 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John M. Crowell, Respondent, v. Mary Elizabeth Jackson et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 1, 1877;
decided June 12, 1877.)
P. V. R. Van Wyck, for appellants.
W. McDermot, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion. Rapallo, J., absent. Judgment affirmed.