Tax

CARLETON DRY GOODS CO., Petitioner, v. David BURNET, Commissioner, etc.

57 F.2d 1073·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CARLETON DRY GOODS CO., Petitioner, v. David BURNET, Commissioner, etc. No. 9243. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Feb. 12, 1932. Henry J. Richardson, of Washington, D. G., and Luther Ely Smith and Elmer E. Pearey, both of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., So-wall'Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and James K. Polk, Jr., Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Cause remanded to Board of Tax Appeals, per stipulation of parties.