Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas S. Coombs, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant; Jesse G. Edwards, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant, 1902 — 173 N.Y. 585 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas S. Coombs, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant; Jesse G. Edwards, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant
173 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas S. Coombs, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant. Jesse G. Edwards, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.
Goombs v. Güy of Mount Vernon; Edioards v. City of Mount Vernon, 64 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
(Submitted December 5, 1902;
decided December 18, 1902.)
Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 9, 1901, affirming judgments in favor of plaintiffs entered upon verdicts directed by the court.
William J. Marshall for appellant,
George C. Appell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.