Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company, Plaintiff, v. John T. Williams, Appellant, and Fagan Iron Works, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company, Plaintiff, v. John T. Williams, Appellant, and Fagan Iron Works, Respondent
184 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company, Plaintiff, v. John T. Williams, Appellant, and Fagan Iron Works, Respondent.
N. T. Arch. Terra Cotta Co. v. Williams, 102 App. Div. 1, affirmed.
(Argued March 6, 1906;
decided March 20, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 11, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of the defendant Fagan Iron Works entered upon the report of a referee.
Eicha/rd> T. Greene for appellant.
Frederick Hulse for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.