Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Sachs et al., Respondents, v. American Surety Company of New York, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 551 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Sachs et al., Respondents, v. American Surety Company of New York, Appellant
177 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Sachs et al., Respondents, v. American Surety Company of New York, Appellant.
Sachs v. American Surety Co., 72 App. Div. 60, affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1903;
decided January 5; 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment entered June 11, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, and directing judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
Charles De Hart Brower and Hemry O. Willcox for appellant.
George W. Wickersham for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. •
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J. •