Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Morris HOFFMAN v. Ernest J. LANDRY, Receiver of the ESTATE of John B. HAVILAND, Bankrupt, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Morris HOFFMAN v. Ernest J. LANDRY, Receiver of the ESTATE of John B. HAVILAND, Bankrupt
22 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris HOFFMAN v. Ernest J. LANDRY, Receiver of the ESTATE of John B. HAVILAND, Bankrupt.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 14, 1927.
No. 4854.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Charles C. Simons, Judge.
Fixel & Fixel, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Anderson, Wilcox, Lacy & Lawson, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It not appearing that the mortgage covered any property intended for resale, order of District Court reversed, with costs, and cause remanded for the entry of an order as prayed in the reclamation petition, or for the proceeds of the property if it has been sold.