Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel Verden, Appellant, v. Isaac Coleman, 1859 — 63 U.S. 192 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel Verden, Appellant, v. Isaac Coleman
63 U.S. 19222 How. 192·Supreme Court of the United States·1859
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Verden, Appellant, v. Isaac Coleman.
No appeal can be taken from the final decision of a State court- of last resort, under the 25th section of the judiciary act, to- the Supreme Court of the ' United States. A writ of error alone can bring up the cause.
This was an appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana, purporting to be brought up under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act.
It was a case of foreclosure of a mortgage brought in the Benton Circuit Court, (State court.) In the progress of the trial, there was a bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the presiding judge, and the ease then carried up by appeal to the Supreme Court of the State. That court affirmed the judgment of the court below, upon which an appeal was prayed to the United States Supreme Court, which prayer was granted. The appeal bond recited that Samuel Verden hath “prosecuted a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States,” &c., but no writ of error was sued out.
. It is not necessary to notice the nature of the case any further.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice CATRON]
Mr. Justice CATRON
delivered the opinion of the court.
Coleman sued Verden in a State court oflndiana, on a note of hand, and a mortgage of lands, to secure its payment. On various pleadings and proofs, the cause was submitted for judgment to the court, the parties having dispensed with a jury. Judgment was rendered against Verden, who appealed to the Supremo Court of Indiana. There the judgment of the circuit was affirmed.
This occurred on the 26th day of June, 1868. And then we find the following entry of record: “And afterwards, to wit, at a court began and held on the 24th of .May, 1858, and continued from day to day till July 16th, 1858, at which time 'lome the appellant, by Hon D. Mace, his attorney, and prays dn appeal to the United States Supreme Court, which pray’ei is granted.”
Bond was given to prosecute the appeal, and ihe clerk certifies the record to be a true copy of the proceedings.
No appeal can be taken from the final decision of a State court of last resort, under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act, to the Supreme Court of the United States. A writ of error alone can bring up the cause. We refer to the appendix of Curtis’s Digest for the mode.
It is ordered that the case be dismissed.