Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased; Jennie Tinney, Appellant; John Flynn, as Administrator of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased, Respondent, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 689 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased; Jennie Tinney, Appellant; John Flynn, as Administrator of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased, Respondent
160 N.Y. 689·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased. Jennie Tinney, Appellant; John Flynn, as Administrator of Rose Ferrigan, Deceased, Respondent.
(Argued October 3, 1899;
decided October 17, 1899.)
Matter of Ferrigan, 43 App. Div. 1, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 13, 1899, affirming a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York removing the appellant as administratrix of Rose Ferrigan, deceased.
Bernard J. Tinney for appellant.
Carlisle Norwood for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not voting.