Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Timothy B. Blackstone, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. Isabella F. Blackstone, Individually and as Executrix, Appellant; The Comptroller of the City of New York et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Timothy B. Blackstone, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. Isabella F. Blackstone, Individually and as Executrix, Appellant; The Comptroller of the City of New York et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Timothy B. Blackstone, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. Isabella F. Blackstone, Individually and as Executrix, Appellant; The Comptroller of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
Matter of Blackstone, 69 App. Div. 127, affirmed.
(Argued June 9, 1902;
decided June 24, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 1, 1902, which reversed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court declaring certain property belonging to the estate of Timothy B. Blackstone, deceased, exempt from a transfer tax.
Also motions to correct return on and to dismiss said appeal.
Edward W. Sheldon for appellant.
Julius Offenbach and Thomas Penney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that this case is controlled by Matter of Hondayer (150 N. Y. 37). Motions to dismiss appeal and to correct record denied, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, J.