Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Neukirch, Appellant, v. Rudolph Keppler, as President of the New York Stock Exchange, Respondent, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Neukirch, Appellant, v. Rudolph Keppler, as President of the New York Stock Exchange, Respondent
174 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Neukirch, Appellant, v. Rudolph Keppler, as President of the New York Stock Exchange, Respondent.
NeukircJi v. Keppler, 56 App. Div. 325, affirmed.
(Argued February 19, 1903;
decided March 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 28, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint hy the court on trial at Special Term.
Simon TV. Rosendale and George P. Ilotaling for appellant.
Lewis Gass Ledyard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ.