Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Davis, Administratrix, v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co., 1945 — 324 U.S. 846 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Davis, Administratrix, v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co.
324 U.S. 846·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 775.
Davis, Administratrix, v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co.
February 12, 1945.
Mr. Erie Pettus for petitioner.
Messrs. Sidney S. Alderman, J. T. Stokely, H. G. Hedrick and S. R. Prince for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied for the reason that it does not appear from the record or from the papers submitted that the judgment is final.