Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Kelly, Appellant, v. The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 589 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Kelly, Appellant, v. The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent
164 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Kelly, Appellant, v. The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent.
Kelly v. Connecticut Mut. L. Ins. Oo., 17 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
(Argued October 10, 1900;
decided October 30, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 27, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
P. C. Dugan and J. Newton Fiero for appellant.
Samuel S. Hatt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ. Not voting: Parker, Oh. J. Not sitting: Landon, J.