Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Local Union No. 25 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America et al. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.; Holman v. Matthews, Commissioner of Banks of Wisconsin; Daniels et al. v. Thomas; Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.; Kiefer v. United States; Terry v. Seegmiller; Baudhuin v. Wisconsin ex rel. Mattison; Weiss v. United States; Mario Mercado e Hijos v. Pasarell et al.; Bloch v. United States; Brinkley v. Texas; Morgan v. City of New York; Shotkin v. Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of Florida et al.; Williams v. Georgia; Spears v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.; Gwyther v. Talbott, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.; Grimm v. Washington; Welch v. Criminal District Court of Reeves County, Texas, 1956 — 350 U.S. 977 · caselaw · US