General
J. A. Axtell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Cyrus Webber
203 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 26.
J. A. Axtell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Cyrus Webber.
Argued October 16, 1906.
Decided October 22, 1906.
Mr. Albert R. Allen, Mr. C. M. O’Neil and Mr. George E. Clarke for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas J. Knox and Mr. Andrew C. Dunn for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Beaupre v. Noyes, 138 U. S. 397; National Life Insurance Company v. Scheffer, 131 U. S. App. C. C. III.