Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lee & Simmons, Inc., Appellee, v. The Steam Tug SOCONY NO. 8, Her Engines, etc., Standard Transportation Company, Appellant, 1930 — 42 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
Lee & Simmons, Inc., Appellee, v. The Steam Tug SOCONY NO. 8, Her Engines, etc., Standard Transportation Company, Appellant
42 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lee & Simmons, Inc., Appellee, v. The Steam Tug SOCONY NO. 8, Her Engines, etc., Standard Transportation Company, Appellant.
No. 250.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 21, 1930.
Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (J. Dudley Eggleston, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Frederick W. Park, of New York City, for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case involves only questions of fact. The District Judge saw the three witnesses who testified, and his conclusion must have been largely influenced by their appearance, as there is nothing determinative in the printed record. We can therefore see no reason for disturbing his decision. It is as probable that the Socony No. 8 was on the wrong side of the river as that she was seeking a haven. The proof of any fault on the part of the Olympia is certainly open to doubt.
Decree affirmed.