Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Crane, Respondent, v. Daniel K. Travis, impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1874 — 57 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Crane, Respondent, v. Daniel K. Travis, impleaded, etc., Appellant
57 N.Y. 636·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Crane, Respondent, v. Daniel K. Travis, impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued September 25, 1873;
decided January term, 1874.)
The only question discussed in this case was, as to whether there was any evidence to sustain the findings of fact of the referee.
Amasa J. Parker for the appellant.
N. H. Clement for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, C.,]
Earl, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.