Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. ANDREWS et al., 1976 — 425 U.S. 559 · caselaw · US
General
DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. ANDREWS et al.
425 U.S. 55948 L. Ed. 2d 169·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. ANDREWS et al.
No. 74-1318.
Argued March 3, 1976
Decided May 3, 1976
William A. Attain and Champ T. Temey argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs was A. F. Summer, Attorney General of Mississippi.
Charles Victor McTeer and Rhonda Copelon argued the cause for respondents. With them on the briefs were Morton Stavis and Nancy Stearns.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Peter B. Sandmann and Susanne Martinez for the Child Welfare League of America, and by Mary C. Dunlap, Wendy W. Williams, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Melvin L. Wulf for Equal Rights Advocates, Inc., et al.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, and Abner W. Sibal for the United States, and by Stephen J. Poliak, Martin J. Flynn, Richard M. Sharp, and David Rubin for the National Education Assn.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.