Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dictograph Products Co., Inc., v. Sonotone Corporation et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 883 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Dictograph Products Co., Inc., v. Sonotone Corporation et al.
352 U.S. 883·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 23, 1956.
No. 332.
Dictograph Products Co., Inc., v. Sonotone Corporation et al.
Louis P. Haffer for petitioner. John E. Fetzer was on the stipulation for Greibach, respondent. With him on a brief in opposition to the petition was Charles H. Tuttle for the Sonotone Corporation, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Dismissed per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.