Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles S. Kent, Respondent, v. Asa K. West, Impleaded with George F. West et al., as Committee of the Person and Property of Asa K. West, Appellants, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 749 · caselaw · US
General
Charles S. Kent, Respondent, v. Asa K. West, Impleaded with George F. West et al., as Committee of the Person and Property of Asa K. West, Appellants
154 N.Y. 749·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles S. Kent, Respondent, v. Asa K. West, Impleaded with George F. West et al., as Committee of the Person and Property of Asa K. West, Appellants.
Kent v. West, 16 App. Div. 496, affirmed.
(Submitted October 18, 1897;
decided November 23, 1897.)
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 15, 1897, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to restrain the prosecution of the action and to punish the plaintiff for contempt of court in prosecuting it.
Jenney do Jenney for appellants.
F. N. Wilson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.