Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, et al., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 50 · caselaw · US
General
ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, et al.
134 S. Ct. 50186 L. Ed. 2d 961·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, et al.
No. 12-929.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 01, 2013.
Motion of Professor Stephen E. Sachs for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument denied. Parties, however, should be prepared to address at oral argument the arguments raised in the brief of Professor Stephen E. Sachs as amicus curiae in support of neither party.