Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HALLMARK CARE SERVICES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, Spokane County, 2019 — 140 S. Ct. 122 · caselaw · US
General
HALLMARK CARE SERVICES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, Spokane County
140 S. Ct. 122205 L. Ed. 2d 41·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HALLMARK CARE SERVICES, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, Spokane County
No. 18-1544
Supreme Court of the United States.
October 7, 2019
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.