Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. BRADLEY; BRADLEY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 1929 — 31 F.2d 569 · caselaw · US
General
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. BRADLEY; BRADLEY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
31 F.2d 569·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. BRADLEY. BRADLEY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 18, 1929.
Nos. 129, 157.
James M. Brinson, Robert E. Healy, Adrien F. Busiek, and Alfred M. Craven, all of Washington, D. C.5 for Federal Trade Commission.
Walter D. Yankauer and Schaffer & Lake, all of New York City, for Bradley.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The order to cease and desist of the Federal Trade Commission of January 21, 1928, is affirmed, and an order of this court will be entered perpetually enjoining J ames J. Bradley in the terms of said order to cease and desist.