Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel T. Guilford, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Mills, as Sheriff, etc., Respondent, 1893 — 137 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel T. Guilford, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Mills, as Sheriff, etc., Respondent
137 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel T. Guilford, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Mills, as Sheriff, etc., Respondent.
(Argued January 17, 1893;
decided February 7, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made Much 15, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintif entered upon a decision of the court on trial at" Special Terr and granted a new trial.
Edgar T. Brackett for appellant.
L. H. Northrup for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order and for judgment absolute in favor of defendant on stipulation; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.