Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter Alexander, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of William R. Smith, Doing Business as Worthington, Smith & Co., Appellant, v. The Fourteenth Street Bank, Respondent, 1806 — 185 N.Y. 551 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Peter Alexander, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of William R. Smith, Doing Business as Worthington, Smith & Co., Appellant, v. The Fourteenth Street Bank, Respondent
185 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1806·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter Alexander, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of William R. Smith, Doing Business as Worthington, Smith & Co., Appellant, v. The Fourteenth Street Bank, Respondent.
Alexander v. Fourteenth Street Bank, 105 App. Div. 642, affirmed.
(Argued April 24, 1906;
decided May 8, 1806.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division .of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 20, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover the proceeds of certain checks.
William C. Rosenberg for appellant.
Rollin M. Morgan and Richard H. Mitchell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.